Head to head
Figsnap vs pixelpact
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
The Figma file you have open, as MCP tools. Extract, edit, and keep a saved set.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Extract a visual contract from a reference page and measure an implementation against it
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 89 out of 100). pixelpact has noticeably more public adoption.
| Figsnap | pixelpact | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 17 |
| Downloads / week | 39 | 75 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 41 | 4 |
| Write actions | 8 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |