Mmcp.market

Head to head

Smart Context vs Obsidian

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Smart Contextio.github.Arrayo/smart-context-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Reduces AI agent token usage by 90% via context compression and task checkpoint persistence.

Full listing
Obsidianio.github.cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Read, write, search, and surgically edit Obsidian notes, tags, and frontmatter via MCP.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Obsidian (92/100 against 66). Obsidian has noticeably more public adoption.

 Smart ContextObsidian
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC66/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars4682
Downloads / week3335.5k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools22—
Write actions3—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryProductivityProductivity

Other comparisons

Smart Context vs SimMirrorSmart Context vs SlackSmart Context vs OswrightSmart Context vs UsageMax public observabilityAll Productivity servers