Head to head
Cricket vs Mellos Mapping
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Live ball-by-ball cricket, prediction-market prices, and a win model fitted on 17,907 matches.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live layered dependency map for bottom-up development, drawn by the agent in a terminal pane.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 85 out of 100). Cricket is hosted and callable through the gateway; Mellos Mapping runs on your own machine. Mellos Mapping has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cricket | Mellos Mapping | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 64 |
| Downloads / week | – | 554 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 15 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-12 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |