Head to head
Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs Gitlab
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Codebase analysis: dependency graphs, security scanning, and refactor plans for GitHub and GitLab.
Full listingNo reviews yet
GitLab MCP server for projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, wiki, releases, and more.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Gitlab (83/100 against 55). Gitlab has noticeably more public adoption.
| Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis | Gitlab | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 23 | 2.0k |
| Downloads / week | 84 | 68k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 100 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |
Other comparisons
Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs oveccGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs TerraVisionGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs Gk CLIGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs Dep DiffGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs GitHubAll Developer tools servers