Head to head
Loki Mode vs ReturnCheck
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Autonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI with an MCP server exposing 36 tools over stdio.
Full listingReturnCheck
Aio.github.mangelmartinezfer-hue/returncheckNo reviews yet
Can this product actually be returned? The merchant's exact clause, its URL and the date.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ReturnCheck (91/100 against 77). ReturnCheck is hosted and callable through the gateway; Loki Mode runs on your own machine. Loki Mode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Loki Mode | ReturnCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.1k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 4.8k | 31 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 43 | 1 |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |