Head to head
MCP Server vs ShipStatic
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pre-deploy ship gate AI agents call before shipping. Also audits the agent's own MCP config.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Deploy static websites from AI agents. Free at mcp.shipstatic.com — no install, no signup.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 88 out of 100). ShipStatic is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. ShipStatic has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Server | ShipStatic | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 7 |
| Downloads / week | 73 | 1.8k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |