Head to head
Web Browser (kogiQA) vs Can I Use
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
This web browser has been designed to help your agent debug and develop complex web applications.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Browser support for web features, live from caniuse. From which version, and is it safe to ship?
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Can I Use (67/100 against 55). Can I Use is hosted and callable through the gateway; Web Browser (kogiQA) runs on your own machine. Web Browser (kogiQA) has noticeably more public adoption.
| Web Browser (kogiQA) | Can I Use | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 95 | – |
| Downloads / week | 384 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |