Head to head
Tradingview vs HPSILab Quant Finance
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real-time market data, screeners, technical analysis & backtesting for stocks, crypto and forex.
Full listing
No reviews yet
HPSILab Quant finance MCP for US stocks, ETFs, options, Monte Carlo, backtesting, and risk analysis.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 88 out of 100). Tradingview has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tradingview | HPSILab Quant Finance | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.6k | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 63 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 10 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |