Head to head
mcp-seo-audit vs Crawlie
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcp-seo-audit
Bio.github.atomno-mcp/mcp-seo-auditNo reviews yet
Technical SEO site audit MCP: health score, issues, robots, sitemap, JSON-LD.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Technical SEO + GEO (AI-search) site audits: hosted crawls, prioritized fixes, report diffs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (82 and 88 out of 100). Crawlie is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-seo-audit runs on your own machine.
| mcp-seo-audit | Crawlie | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 111 |
| Downloads / week | 33 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-07-18 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |