Head to head
Attestari vs travel.art
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Attestari
Bio.github.attestari/attestariNo reviews yet
Auditable memory for AI agents: provable deletion, tamper-evident audit, time-travel recall.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Art-tourism data for AI agents: biennales, art fairs, museums, layover itineraries with 2026 facts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours travel.art (89/100 against 77). travel.art is hosted and callable through the gateway; Attestari runs on your own machine.
| Attestari | travel.art | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 39 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-12 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |