Mmcp.market

Head to head

gdharness vs mcp

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

gdharnessio.github.Aureliolo/gdharness
A
No reviews yet

A harness for driving a Godot 4 project from an agent: addons, runtime bridge, MCP server, CLI.

Full listing
mcpcom.decionis/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Authorize consequential AI agent actions before execution

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp (99/100 against 85). mcp is hosted and callable through the gateway; gdharness runs on your own machine. mcp has noticeably more public adoption.

 gdharnessmcp
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100A99/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars1533
Downloads / week4.6k297
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

gdharness vs ha-mcpgdharness vs IWEgdharness vs fiori-mcp-servergdharness vs mcp-local-raggdharness vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers