Mmcp.market

Head to head

Gdharness vs Sourcey

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Gdharnessio.github.Aureliolo/gdharness
A
No reviews yet

A harness for driving a Godot 4 project from an agent: addons, runtime bridge, MCP server, CLI.

Full listing
Sourceyio.github.sourcey/mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Stdio bridge to Sourcey startup offers and Agent Readiness report cards.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Sourcey (94/100 against 85). Gdharness has noticeably more public adoption.

 GdharnessSourcey
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100A94/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars10
Downloads / week6.5k30
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-08-29
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Gdharness vs Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude CodeGdharness vs Ask CodexGdharness vs mcptoonGdharness vs ContextStream MCP ServerGdharness vs Godot MCPAll AI and agents servers