Head to head
Aurentia vs Pipedrive
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Your Aurentia workspace — projects, CRM, tasks, deliverables — in Claude, Cursor or any MCP client.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Pipedrive CRM as MCP tools: find deals, people and companies, and move deals through a pipeline.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pipedrive (88/100 against 75). Aurentia is hosted and callable through the gateway; Pipedrive runs on your own machine.
| Aurentia | Pipedrive | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 408 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |