Mmcp.market

Head to head

Ausca vs mcp

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Auscacom.ausca/agent-services
B
No reviews yet

Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.

Full listing
mcpcom.decionis/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Authorize consequential AI agent actions before execution

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp (99/100 against 84). mcp has noticeably more public adoption.

 Auscamcp
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB84/100A99/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars13533
Downloads / week86297
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools14—
Write actions3—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Ausca vs ha-mcpAusca vs IWEAusca vs fiori-mcp-serverAusca vs mcp-local-ragAusca vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers