Head to head
Qdrant MCP vs Citadel
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Encrypted-first embedded database with vector search and agent memory, exposed as MCP tools
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 82 out of 100). Citadel has noticeably more public adoption.
| Qdrant MCP | Citadel | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 40 | 594 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |