Head to head
Memorix vs Board feet to cubic meters, number discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Board feet to cubic meters, number discarded (91/100 against 74). Board feet to cubic meters, number discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; Memorix runs on your own machine. Memorix has noticeably more public adoption.
| Memorix | Board feet to cubic meters, number discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 788 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.4k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 47 | 30 |
| Write actions | 9 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |