Head to head
Catalog vs CHAP Coordinator
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search Avva for an expert, then connect their model - judgment from real past decisions.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Auditable records of human decisions over AI agent work. Approvals, edits, overrides, escalations.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CHAP Coordinator (94/100 against 69). Catalog is hosted and callable through the gateway; CHAP Coordinator runs on your own machine. CHAP Coordinator has noticeably more public adoption.
| Catalog | CHAP Coordinator | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 102 |
| Downloads / week | – | 127 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |