Head to head
Echo Memory vs Run402
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared memory for AI agents, as a graph in your own Postgres. Writes never call an LLM.
Full listing
No reviews yet
x402 pay-per-call infra for agents: $0.03 image generation, Postgres, auth, storage, functions.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Echo Memory (92/100 against 84). Run402 has noticeably more public adoption.
| Echo Memory | Run402 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 24 |
| Downloads / week | – | 3.5k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |