Head to head
ZOOQ - LinkedIn Data for AI Agents vs GTM API: LinkedIn MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Live LinkedIn data for AI agents: profiles, companies, jobs, posts, email finding. No account risk.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Managed LinkedIn MCP server for AI agents: search, connect, message and enrich on accounts you own.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GTM API: LinkedIn MCP Server (98/100 against 88). GTM API: LinkedIn MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| ZOOQ - LinkedIn Data for AI Agents | GTM API: LinkedIn MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 90 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 45 | — |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-24 | 2026-09-24 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |
Other comparisons
ZOOQ - LinkedIn Data for AI Agents vs Linkedin DataZOOQ - LinkedIn Data for AI Agents vs LinkedIn MCP ServerZOOQ - LinkedIn Data for AI Agents vs Linkedin Post Engager CaptureZOOQ - LinkedIn Data for AI Agents vs LinkedIn Profile Finder - Email to LinkedIn URL LookupZOOQ - LinkedIn Data for AI Agents vs NilyoAll Sales and outbound servers