Head to head
Beatra vs SearXNG MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Self-hosted SearXNG metasearch for MCP clients: web, image, news, video, music and page fetch.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SearXNG MCP Server (92/100 against 70). Beatra is hosted and callable through the gateway; SearXNG MCP Server runs on your own machine.
| Beatra | SearXNG MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Media | Media |