Head to head
LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway vs MCPify
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only checks for proposed orders against evidence and policy; no trading or payment authority.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Non-custodial Hyperliquid perp trading: live markets, account state, user-armed order execution
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway (91/100 against 67). LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway has noticeably more public adoption.
| LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway | MCPify | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | 13 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | — |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |