Head to head
Docdex vs LoopingAgent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Fast per-repo documentation indexer and full-text search MCP server for codebases.
Full listingNo reviews yet
English blog + agentic AI architect profile (Paris): search, full text, projects, booking.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Docdex (77/100 against 69). LoopingAgent is hosted and callable through the gateway; Docdex runs on your own machine. Docdex has noticeably more public adoption.
| Docdex | LoopingAgent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 15 | – |
| Downloads / week | 984 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-08-27 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |