Head to head
genefoundry vs deja-vu
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP gateway federating 22 biomedical MCP servers behind one endpoint: gnomAD, ClinVar, HPO, VEP.
Full listingdeja-vu
Aio.github.vshulcz/deja-vuNo reviews yet
deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of thirty-three coding agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (97 and 92 out of 100). genefoundry is hosted and callable through the gateway; deja-vu runs on your own machine. deja-vu has noticeably more public adoption.
| genefoundry | deja-vu | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 847 |
| Downloads / week | – | 929 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |