Head to head
Bilg vs ivygrep
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared memory for coding agents and their teams: docs, epics, tasks and decisions over MCP.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ivygrep (88/100 against 70). Bilg is hosted and callable through the gateway; ivygrep runs on your own machine. ivygrep has noticeably more public adoption.
| Bilg | ivygrep | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 6 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |