Head to head
Bilg vs Workfile
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared memory for coding agents and their teams: docs, epics, tasks and decisions over MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Repository-native protocol and local MCP server for Work, Docs, History and durable project Memory.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Workfile (92/100 against 70). Bilg is hosted and callable through the gateway; Workfile runs on your own machine. Workfile has noticeably more public adoption.
| Bilg | Workfile | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 663 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 32 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |