Head to head
MCP vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Crypto market data: order book depth, liquidity lifetimes and taker flow on 9 spot venues
Full listing
No reviews yet
US/HK markets — 163 tools: quotes, options, orders, fundamentals, screener, IPO, alerts, DCA & grid
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (100/100 against 80). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine.
| MCP | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 14 |
| Downloads / week | 42 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |