Head to head
MCP vs MCPify
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Crypto market data: order book depth, liquidity lifetimes and taker flow on 9 spot venues
Full listing
No reviews yet
Non-custodial Hyperliquid perp trading: live markets, account state, user-armed order execution
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (80/100 against 67). MCPify is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | MCPify | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 42 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 13 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-06 | — |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |