Head to head
Arxiv vs Courtlistener
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search arXiv papers, download full text, semantic search, citation graphs, and alerts via MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search US court opinions, federal dockets, judges, citations, and oral arguments via CourtListener.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 93 out of 100). Courtlistener is hosted and callable through the gateway; Arxiv runs on your own machine.
| Arxiv | Courtlistener | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3.2k | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 612 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 14 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |