Head to head
Arxiv vs HasData Google Scholar
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search arXiv papers, download full text, semantic search, citation graphs, and alerts via MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Google Scholar search results, citation counts and citation export formats, as structured JSON.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HasData Google Scholar (100/100 against 92). HasData Google Scholar is hosted and callable through the gateway; Arxiv runs on your own machine.
| Arxiv | HasData Google Scholar | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3.2k | 10 |
| Downloads / week | – | 41 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |