Head to head
Arxiv vs Lynx
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search arXiv papers, download full text, semantic search, citation graphs, and alerts via MCP.
Full listingLynx
Aio.github.lorenzo-cambiaghi/lynxNo reviews yet
LynxMCP: 100% local MCP server for the code questions grep can't answer: call graph, hybrid search
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 92 out of 100). Arxiv has noticeably more public adoption.
| Arxiv | Lynx | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3.2k | 9 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 18 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |