Head to head
BridgeNode MCP vs Fidelis Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
BridgeNode — x402 pay-per-request AI inference. OpenAI-compatible API + MCP, Solana USDC, gas-free.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 83 out of 100). BridgeNode MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fidelis Memory runs on your own machine.
| BridgeNode MCP | Fidelis Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 23 |
| Downloads / week | 141 | 382 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT-0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |