Head to head
BriefPort Agent Delivery vs Total Agent Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Coding agents read frozen requirements, report progress, and submit delivery evidence.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Persistent local memory for coding agents: temporal knowledge graph, procedural and episodic recall
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Total Agent Memory (85/100 against 60). BriefPort Agent Delivery is hosted and callable through the gateway; Total Agent Memory runs on your own machine. Total Agent Memory has noticeably more public adoption.
| BriefPort Agent Delivery | Total Agent Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 68 |
| Downloads / week | – | 166 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 76 |
| Write actions | — | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |