Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent-Native Dispatch vs Snap Router

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent-Native Dispatchio.github.BuilderIO/agent-native-dispatch
A
No reviews yet

Central Slack/Telegram router with jobs, memory, approvals, and A2A delegation

Full listing
Snap Routerio.github.trigeochiral/snap-router
B
No reviews yet

Task-to-tool discovery over the merged x402 Bazaar + MCP Registry catalog

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Dispatch (98/100 against 80). Agent-Native Dispatch is hosted and callable through the gateway; Snap Router runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Dispatch has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent-Native DispatchSnap Router
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA98/100B80/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars4.9k0
Downloads / week–18
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-04
CategoryProductivityProductivity

Other comparisons

Agent-Native Dispatch vs WorkfileAgent-Native Dispatch vs SlackAgent-Native Dispatch vs Telegram SlackAgent-Native Dispatch vs lociAgent-Native Dispatch vs ExomemAll Productivity servers