Head to head
Agent-Native Plan vs Fitter
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Structured visual plans and PR recaps with diagrams, prototypes, annotations, and sharing
Full listing
No reviews yet
Turn any website or API into structured JSON with LLM-authored declarative scraping configs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Plan (98/100 against 88). Agent-Native Plan is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fitter runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Plan has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent-Native Plan | Fitter | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.9k | 133 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-08-29 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |