Head to head
Agent-Native Slides vs Google Jules
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Slides (98/100 against 83). Agent-Native Slides is hosted and callable through the gateway; Google Jules runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Slides has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent-Native Slides | Google Jules | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.9k | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 101 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 20 |
| Write actions | — | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |