Head to head
SSH Manager vs Arcstone Sidecar
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SSH server management for agents, with per-server read-only and allowlist security modes
Full listingNo reviews yet
Deterministic execution boundary and reference MCP sidecar for Arcstone Security Stack
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SSH Manager (74/100 against 65). SSH Manager has noticeably more public adoption.
| SSH Manager | Arcstone Sidecar | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 484 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 617 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |