Head to head
SSH Manager vs Site
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SSH server management for agents, with per-server read-only and allowlist security modes
Full listing
No reviews yet
Vacant Property Security Cost: the site's own MCP server — enquiry (enquiry = a human handoff,...
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SSH Manager (74/100 against 56). Site is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH Manager runs on your own machine. SSH Manager has noticeably more public adoption.
| SSH Manager | Site | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | C56/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 484 | – |
| Downloads / week | 617 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 3 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |