Head to head
Google Maps MCP Server vs Earthquake
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
18 Google Maps tools for AI agents — geocode, search, directions, weather, and more.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search USGS and EMSC seismic data — real-time feeds, event queries, and earthquake counts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Earthquake (93/100 against 83). Earthquake is hosted and callable through the gateway; Google Maps MCP Server runs on your own machine. Google Maps MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Google Maps MCP Server | Earthquake | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 460 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 2.8k | 576 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |