Head to head
FronyBoard vs Neon
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Project tracker for AI agents: roadmap, periods, tasks and a validation gate, in one SQLite file
Full listing
No reviews yet
Official Neon MCP server for managing Neon projects and Lakebase Postgres databases.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 97 out of 100). Neon is hosted and callable through the gateway; FronyBoard runs on your own machine. Neon has noticeably more public adoption.
| FronyBoard | Neon | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 648 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |