Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-device vs MUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACT

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-deviceio.github.callstack/agent-device
A
No reviews yet

MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps

Full listing
MUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACTio.github.wmujahid428-web/trust-layer
C
No reviews yet

MUJ428 verifies intent and evidence before consequential AI-agent actions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours agent-device (94/100 against 57). MUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACT is hosted and callable through the gateway; agent-device runs on your own machine. agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-deviceMUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACT
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA94/100C57/100
AdoptionWidely usedNew
GitHub stars4.7k–
Downloads / week118k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools114
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-19—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

agent-device vs Munim Computer Useagent-device vs Mockserveragent-device vs Godot MCPagent-device vs Ios Agent Skillagent-device vs Watch SkillAll AI and agents servers