Head to head
searchts vs Wikipedia
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Keyless web access for AI agents: read bot-walled pages as Markdown, search, grab assets
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search Wikipedia, read summaries and full text, target sections, find nearby pages, list languages.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 93 out of 100). Wikipedia is hosted and callable through the gateway; searchts runs on your own machine. Wikipedia has noticeably more public adoption.
| searchts | Wikipedia | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 396 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |