Head to head
Slid Phi Labs vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
CuNi exactness, Chamber two-key JSON, Agent-Rider. Lab signup, agent keys, x402 catalog.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (83/100 against 57). Slid Phi Labs is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Slid Phi Labs | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 32 |
| Downloads / week | – | 193 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 42 | 7 |
| Write actions | 1 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |