Head to head
Chasync vs Hunter MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage Chasync funnels, forms, email templates and leads from MCP-compatible AI assistants.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Hunter.io MCP: domain search, email finder and verifier, enrichment, discovery, leads. 11 tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Hunter MCP (80/100 against 67). Chasync is hosted and callable through the gateway; Hunter MCP runs on your own machine. Hunter MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Chasync | Hunter MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 41 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category |