Head to head
MCP Browser vs Presio
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Browser automation using the user's Chromium session — JS execution, auth, and anti-bot support.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Present PDFs from the browser: upload to start a slideshow or validate Presio sidecars. No auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (80 and 85 out of 100). Presio is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Browser runs on your own machine.
| MCP Browser | Presio | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 27 |
| Downloads / week | 133 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 13 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-12 | 2026-09-25 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |