Head to head
Originselect vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search U.S. product recalls (CPSC, FDA, NHTSA, FSIS) by product, brand, model, or UPC code.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Originselect (83/100 against 69). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Originselect runs on your own machine. Originselect has noticeably more public adoption.
| Originselect | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 75 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 19 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | — |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |