Mmcp.market

Head to head

Flightaware vs FlygKollen — Swedish Flight Tracking

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Flightawareio.github.chrischall/flightaware-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Live flight tracking and aviation data via FlightAware AeroAPI (flights, airports, alerts).

Full listing
FlygKollen — Swedish Flight Trackingio.github.jannegpriv/flygkollen
C
No reviews yet

Swedish flight tracking: live status, gates, airport boards, nearby-aircraft ADS-B scan.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Flightaware (83/100 against 67). FlygKollen — Swedish Flight Tracking is hosted and callable through the gateway; Flightaware runs on your own machine. Flightaware has noticeably more public adoption.

 FlightawareFlygKollen — Swedish Flight Tracking
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C67/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars1–
Downloads / week207–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools33—
Write actions3—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-17—
CategoryMaps and travelMaps and travel

Other comparisons

Flightaware vs 航班管家航空数据 MCP | Flight Master Aviation Data MCPFlightaware vs Vedar — Kamchatka travelFlightaware vs Weather Data MCP ServerFlightaware vs Noaa SpaceweatherFlightaware vs Agentic LedgerAll Maps and travel servers