Head to head
Churnkey vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and manage Churnkey cancel flows, retention metrics, and payment recovery
Full listingMCP Server
Bio.github.madjik-io/mcp-serverNo reviews yet
Quantum-finance market metrics for AI agents, computed by the Black Belt Labs engine.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Churnkey (100/100 against 80). Churnkey is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine.
| Churnkey | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 22 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 30 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-08-30 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |