Head to head
Churnkey vs Xendit
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and manage Churnkey cancel flows, retention metrics, and payment recovery
Full listing
No reviews yet
Xendit payment APIs for AI agents. Payment links, payouts, balances, and transactions.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Churnkey (100/100 against 88). Churnkey is hosted and callable through the gateway; Xendit runs on your own machine.
| Churnkey | Xendit | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 22 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | 39 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 14 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-07-10 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |