Head to head
Churnkey vs payware
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and manage Churnkey cancel flows, retention metrics, and payment recovery
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Churnkey (100/100 against 83). Churnkey is hosted and callable through the gateway; payware runs on your own machine.
| Churnkey | payware | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 22 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 62 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 69 |
| Write actions | — | 21 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |