Head to head
MCP vs PageProof
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web intelligence for AI agents: fetch, render, extract, research. x402 micropayments, no API keys.
Full listingPageProof
Csite.chatgpt.alert-crab-1890.pageproof/pdf-extractNo reviews yet
PDF text by page with hashes. 0.005 USDC/Base via x402. No OCR. Check /health for readiness.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (62 and 69 out of 100). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | PageProof | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 47 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |